SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wayners who wrote (6540)2/1/2004 10:25:58 PM
From: cosmicforce  Respond to of 20773
 
So, may I surmise, that if anyone decides to set a bunch of tight knit lawyers on you, or your family, that there is nothing, anywhere, anytime that someone is or has recently done that would be

1) the least bit embarrassing
2) the least bit illegal

The thing that keeps you free is that:

a) Most people don't personally have anything to gain by doing this and
b) They don't have the money to pursue it
c) They are not sadistic enough to want to do it for recreation.

Now, remove any one of these barriers, just one and someone could ruin you or anyone else in the United States. I am certain of that. There is nobody on the planet that hasn't done something, or have a spouse, or sweetheart, or child, or uncle, or somebody that could be investigated with intense scrutiny. If people act this way, everyone can be compromised.



To: Wayners who wrote (6540)2/1/2004 10:31:52 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20773
 
Right. Personally, I find the extensive overlap between Clinton haters and W suckups interesting, but that's just me.



To: Wayners who wrote (6540)2/2/2004 11:00:14 AM
From: TigerPaw  Respond to of 20773
 
Clinton would have eventually been sued for jaywalking or some other nonsense.

Like the Iraq war, the impeachment was a forgone conclusion one the republicans had a majority vote. It was the same planners. The only question was what scheme would be used.