SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio candidates - Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tinkershaw who wrote (691)2/3/2004 10:56:50 AM
From: Jim Mullens  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2955
 
Tinkershaw, RE: ARMHY valuation- thanks for sharing your insight.

Re: your statement “As an example, a for example model was put out there showing ARM with between 11 billion and 29 billion cores shipped in 2007 at a $.10 per core.”

I was my understanding that unit pricing would increase with the ARM 9 and ARM 11 cores. Does your model using $.10/core reflect increased unit pricing?

Your analysis of ARMHY’s position in the cell phone market was also very interesting as it relates to total cell phone growth. The contrast between the growth in the total cell phone market vs the CDMA based market (Qualcomm’s niche) is very striking and further differentiates the unique potential of QCOM.

TIA- Jim



To: tinkershaw who wrote (691)2/4/2004 1:16:42 AM
From: sschahal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2955
 
Thanks for the detailed write-up - really appreciate it.

I have not read the thread but the way I understand it
a. Units will grow - cell and/or others
b. Cores/unit will grow over time
c. Cores mix will migrate from ARM7 towards 9 to 11 over
time - which are higher $ per core

I would have thought that all these multiplied together - in a decent market - should lead to 30-40% CAGR for royalty growth (just guessing)

Would certainly love to hear more of your con slant on the simple logic above.

Thanks, again.