Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (27601)	2/3/2004 11:00:19 PM
From: Dayuhan	Respond to of 793774

I don't have a URL handy, but I have posted articles showing that precisely the opposite is true. The murder rate in Baghdad is way below our big Cities. So we have a dispute. I wonder which party is right, if any. What is going on at the moment with the Iraqis attempting to form a Government is exactly what is to be expected. Democracy is messy. Oh yeah. Just wait and see how messy it can be. The idea that the kind of underlying ethnic and religious tension that we have in Iraq can be resolved simply by finding the right sort of government structure seems almost pathetically naive to me. We shall see...

To: LindyBill who wrote (27601)	2/3/2004 11:02:57 PM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793774

Have you seen any meaningful discussion of the "spring offensive" supposedly coming up in Afghanistan? I'm particularly interested in seeing how we plan to handle the problem of bad guys hopping across the Pakistani border. The NWFP government is more on the Taliban's side than ours, and the Pakistani military cannot be expected to act effectively against our enemies, who are in many cases their friends. Musharraf, of course, is on thin ice, largely because his pro-West stance is seriously at odds with the views of so many of his people. It seems to me that if he lets US forces operate in Pakistan, or if US forces cross the border without his approval, that could easily spur a coup, especially if Pakistanis are killed. The coup would be likely to have an Islamist slant, which comes close to being a worst-case scenario for us. Our intel on the locations or even the number of the nukes is dubious at best. Regime change would be a pretty complex situation, given the nuclear capability, and the problems of occupation would be monumental, far worse than those of Iraq. The ascension of an Islamist government in Pakistan would also, of course, create an enormously dangerous situation with respect to India. Looks like a very tricky balancing act. One misdirected bomb on a Pakistani village, or even the public perception of such an event - which would not be terribly difficult to fabricate - could create a truly enormous mess.