Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (124259)	2/3/2004 12:06:03 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

My interpretation is that David Kay is, as is usual for Bush appointees, spinning for Bush. You say Kay is spinning FOR Bush; Jacob says that Kay is bravely truth-telling AGAINST Bush. The only thing you two have in common is that neither of you listened to what Kay actually said.

To: Bilow who wrote (124259)	2/3/2004 3:59:19 PM
From: Sam	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

What's hilarious is that this is only the administration's latest version of the truth about Iraq WMDs. This would almost be a believable story except that they've already gone through so many other stories and they're keeping Saddam where he can't be interviewed to give his version of the story. It is hilarious in a black humor kind of way. Their credibility could be slightly restored if they actually allowed a third party to interview some of the generals and Saddam. But no, that would undoubtedly somehow violate national security. Don't ask me how. But I'm sure they would say something like that. Guess Saddam would get a message out to his followers through a UN or some other interrogator. I wonder if one of the investigators in the 6 or 7 investigations now going on will be allowed to talk to any of them. Doubt it. They might learn some truth. That wouldn't do at all.