SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RON BL who wrote (534592)2/3/2004 1:28:56 AM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Respond to of 769670
 
well interesting, your assumption that the dept of education eats up substantial parts of the budget contradicts Paul Krugman's latest column. You do know how to read, right? I have my doubts, because you don't appear to have looked at the federal budget.
nytimes.com

In other words, the role of nonsecurity spending in the plunge into deficit is trivial, compared with tax cuts and security spending. (Credit where credit is due: the administration's budget numbers show the same thing.) And even severe austerity on nonsecurity spending won't make a significant dent in the deficit.



To: RON BL who wrote (534592)2/3/2004 2:44:43 AM
From: Gus  Respond to of 769670
 
Yawwnnnnnn! You're merely parroting the conservative idealogues who are always too eager to sacrifice the genuine prospects of a structural majority for the sake of ideological purity and/or ego. The alternative just ain't worth a damn, ya' know.

There's also the moral imperative to wage this war against terrorism just as decisively as we fought the war against Communism during the 80s. It took only 9 years from Jimmy Carter's trifecta from hell (Saddam, Ayatollah, Afghanistan) in 1980 to the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. Of course, it took only 8 years for Bill Clinton to get his own trifecta from hell (Saddam, Osama Bin Laden/Al Qaeda, North Korea), but Clinton was always the smarter one.<g>



To: RON BL who wrote (534592)2/3/2004 5:44:42 AM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Well, IMHO the department of ED. out to be AT LEAST drastically cut back, and not cause of the budget but because it is INEFFICIENT and HAMPERS any possability of the STATE depts running efficiently. jdn