Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bald Eagle who wrote (534727)	2/3/2004 11:33:46 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Whether you think yes or no, you surely at least have to agree it is a valid quesion and point of debate. Not really. It is clear what Saddam's intent was vis a vis WMD....Saddam never abided by the terms of the 91 cease fire, our men patrolling the no fly zone were constantly shot at, Saddam ordered the assassination of GHWB, Iraq financially supported terror in the ME, notorious terrorists like Abu Nidal and Abu Abbas found haven in Iraq, Saddam's refusal to comply with UNSCR 1441 and many before it doomed thousands of innocent Iraqis who perished under the continuing sanctions imposed by the US and its allies. So, the cost, while certainly grievous, is more than justified when one looks at the facts and considers the implications of the Bush Doctrine......