Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Selectric II who wrote (668)	2/4/2004 11:08:09 AM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Mr. Bush's Guard Service washingtonpost.com Wednesday, February 4, 2004 Much has been made of filmmaker Michael Moore's statement -- calling President Bush a deserter -- at a rally for retired Gen. Wesley K. Clark in New Hampshire a few weeks ago. In a Jan. 18 news story, David S. Broder quoted stories that appeared in the Boston Globe and the Dallas Morning News in 2000; the stories reported finding no evidence that George Bush reported for duty with the National Guard during an eight-month stint in Alabama. Although Mr. Bush's failure to fulfill his Air National Guard duty for an extended period at the height of the Vietnam War did receive media coverage in 2000, it was never made a major issue. Mr. Moore's use of the term "deserter" to describe Mr. Bush seems to have at least briefly resurrected the matter, but only in terms of a discussion of Mr. Clark's failure to distance himself from the charge. Since Sept. 11, 2001, Mr. Bush has emphasized his role as commander in chief in an era of global terrorism, and with the commencement of the presidential campaign, his record of service with the Air National Guard merits more thorough attention. As a fighter pilot in the Air National Guard, Mr. Bush was required not just to report for duty but to log a minimum number of hours of flying time per month to maintain his qualifications to fly. Based on a number of newspaper accounts and official records obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, he did not show up for duty and was grounded for not taking a required annual physical exam. His failure to report for duty as ordered and to log his flying hours to maintain his state of readiness as a fighter pilot when others his age were fighting and dying in Vietnam calls into question his character and traits as a leader. Although Mr. Bush was never penalized for shirking his duty, his conduct is relevant today in that it casts doubt on his credibility as our commander in chief. It should not be ignored by the media. JOHN P. SODER JR. Friendship, Md.

To: Selectric II who wrote (668)	2/4/2004 11:08:33 AM
From: JakeStraw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

Selectric, Waffling is one trait of Kerry's that really troubles me...

To: Selectric II who wrote (668)	2/4/2004 1:46:18 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

What's your point in posting a old column. The voters knew about what you posted. But they thought it was trivial compared to what Bush had done to them. And they went out and voted for Kerry because they thought it is "Kerry who can get Bush out of the White House". All that people care about now is how they can get Bush out of the White House. Not what Kerry has done for himself as long as what he has done is not as bad as what Bush has done to them and their lives. It is like the Clinton impeachment. Nobody dare vote him out because he was doing good things for the American people. When would we start to learn from our past experiences?