Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (27926)	2/4/2004 8:05:51 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793917

Steven is the epitome of the anti-semitic left--no not anti-semetic in the traditional sense but so virulently anti-israel that it just has to be somethng more than fp differences. When I read exchanges like yours with steven I cannot come to any other conclusion. "Kinda like he considers that Israel alone was born in Original Sin, " and the arab states are somehow solely victims of western imperialism which israel is continuing. I kinda give up with these folks especially when they are clearly as intelligent as steven and john m and the lot.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (27926)	2/4/2004 8:59:35 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 793917

I've never seen anyone post on SI about the Stark incident. Though for some reason, lots of people have a lot better memory about the Liberty incident. They seem to be very parallel incidents. In both cases, there was no logical motive for the attack. The US was Israel's only ally at the time of the Liberty incident. And the Stark, by defending the oil shipments of the Arab states financing Saddam's war, was effectively working in Iraq's interest. BTW, similarly I have no doubt the US had no intention of shooting down a civilian Iranian airliner or bombing the Chinese embassy in Belgrade.