Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (734)	2/4/2004 9:28:44 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Respond to of 81568

So does it mean he is better suited to defeat Bush because people are only going to look at who is cleaner than whom? Ann, in this election, people are so angry, that they will not tolerate any of the mud slinging. They would want to hear about jobs, health care etc. So looks (botox) etc. is a non-issue.

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (734)	2/5/2004 12:37:38 AM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 81568

Kerry has no negatives worth mentioning and huge positives. The biggest positive of all is that he may be the only man who can beat Bush, who is the most corrupt and inefficient president we have had at least since Nixon, but probably since Hoover. Edwards has yet to be attacked by the right the way they are attacking Kerry now and did last year. Once Edwards endures the severe scrutiny and exaggerated attacks and lies, his negatives would rise too. for one thing, he gets 55% of his money from what they call trial lawyers. Bushies will then blame Edwards for malpractice lawsuits etc. Not fair but just wait. Edwards has had a holiday so far from scrutiny. Kerry is battle-hardened. Dean has gotten the scrutiny and it has destroyed him already.