SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Oblomov who wrote (16710)2/5/2004 9:48:06 AM
From: J. P.Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
<<Why do you imply that a programmer is a "professional"?I suppose it confers respectability on a task-oriented job>>

Well, the job is more than being task oriented. You have to steer the customer in such a way that the tasks make sense within a business context. Then you have to implement the task in a way that is cost and time effective. Then you have to have the skills and experience as well as native ability to actually make it happen.



To: Oblomov who wrote (16710)2/5/2004 1:11:01 PM
From: Lizzie TudorRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Why do you imply that a programmer is a "professional"?

Well, I do admit that there is a problem with the term "programmer". It is too vague. Lets take the people working in engineering at Juniper, most of whom are programmers. I still consider them to be professionals, a class of engineer. Of course there is some IT work that is not professional also, and those folks are also called programmers.

There are a whole host of professions in the US that could be done by lower skilled cheaper workers, this has been true since the beginning of time. The Marcom/advertising/PR area comes to mind. People who work in PR are typically college educated and earn good salaries. PR skill level imho is **not** at the same level as a person who works at oracle or cisco in engineering. And yet, at this moment in time, the PR person probably has a brighter future, because engineering in technology is under attack from globalization.

Personally I think a lot of CEOs like Carly Fiorina just don't like to deal with engineering, the difficulty of hiring and maintaining staff etc. Probably because she's just a "suit". So she constantly cries the blues about engineering. Otoh people like Steve Jobs thrives on engineering.