SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: hank2010 who wrote (27696)2/5/2004 11:28:01 AM
From: hank2010  Respond to of 39344
 
More significant than 12.34% Nickel over 5.5 m IMO is the following:
“Our goal with this program was to gain a better understanding of geological and structural controls and continuity of the deposit. We accomplished this objective, and are very encouraged that the McWatters deposit appears to be open along strike to the east and west, merely shifted by cross faulting,” said Liberty’s President Eduard Ludwig.

I had considered this a limited tonnage deposit. With ore on both sides of the cross-faulting, the deposit is wide open again.



To: hank2010 who wrote (27696)2/5/2004 1:23:05 PM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 39344
 
Well I am really sorry to hear that they are clogging up with surplus nickel. It used to be a fine low grade property of limited extent. Now they are cursed by fault offset continuations, at both ends no less, and increased nickel impurity in the rock. When the circuits get stuffed with excess nickel it could turn out to be a terrible mess. It might be possible to handle 5 or even 8 % nickel in the matrix, but at 12 percent there would be total breakdown.

My prediction is that it won't be too long before they to throw in the towel and try to find something with less nickel in it. It's not the end of the world. Lots of people have lower grades and even narrower intersections. Maybe they could make a deal somewhere.

EC<:-}