SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (28142)2/6/2004 2:05:56 AM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794411
 

It is a "property" issue, and that still holds in most countries.

If anyone feels that their property rights are being infringed upon by somebody else's marriage, they are welcome to go to court to resolve the issue.

I can agree with your POV, but it is not saleable yet in this country.

The protection of individual rights from politically motivated intrusion is a fundamental purpose of the court system.



To: LindyBill who wrote (28142)2/6/2004 2:15:14 AM
From: Sam  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794411
 
I can agree with your POV, but it is not saleable yet in this country. This "Political land," not "Libertarian land."

It's saleable if enough politicians, and especially the leaders in the parties, want it to be saleable. If they want to use it to get some extra votes by pandering to prejudice, then that is what it will be.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News