Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (28174)	2/9/2004 2:49:27 AM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793841

Would be polygamists are also controversial despite not being queers. I didn’t say “queers”. I said “queer”. As in strange, odd, or different. I think most of us would agree that would be polygamists are queer, in that sense. OK, it’s a trap on a fairly low level, but I wanted to see if anyone would bite. That’s really what it’s all about, you see. The right of people who are different to manage their lives as they see fit, even though they are different. As far as I’m concerned, as long as they aren’t having any negative impact on anyone else, they should be allowed to do as they please. That seems a very American sentiment, to me.