SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GraceZ who wrote (16818)2/6/2004 10:17:51 AM
From: gpowellRead Replies (4) | Respond to of 306849
 
I do not think many of the younger individuals realize how tough things were between 1975 and 1985. It was the worst economic downturn since the great depression and it seems no one under 35 has any comprehension.



To: GraceZ who wrote (16818)2/6/2004 2:22:36 PM
From: fattyRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
>The error in your probability statement lay in the fact that you assume that the subset has the same distribution as the set it was taken from.

Moving on to Set Theory 101? In case you don't know, a subset can be the set itself. In this case, the distribution would be the same for the set and the subset.

You may want a refresher on set and other math topics before moving on to another unknown territory:

mathworld.wolfram.com