SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (16826)2/6/2004 12:14:20 PM
From: Elroy JetsonRespond to of 306849
 
Don't forget how Greenspan has "bogused-up" reported productivity and GDP by under-counting inflation.

As you know, the current economic statistics are close to meaningless.

We need someone to put the Fed back on track. Then I can bring my money back home from Australia.

Capital goes where it's respected, and it's being treated like dirt here.

It's just like the decline of Britain in the 1970's.

The government told lies of prosperity while the wealthy sent their money offshore to avoid losing everything in a sinking currency.



To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (16826)2/6/2004 1:05:14 PM
From: Elroy JetsonRespond to of 306849
 
Thank you for sharing this information from the latest ContraryInvestor with me.
This clearly explains the massive reduction in Aggregate Demand in the U.S. economy and why businesses are afraid to invest here.

Average Wages In Growing Industries vs. Contracting Industries
(November 2001- November 2003)

TOTAL US AVERAGE
$35,410 average wage in expanding industries
$44,570 average wage in contracting industries
(21)% decline in wages

The first number for each state is average salary in growing industries;

the second figure is average salary in contracting industries;

the third figure is the percentage difference.

Only Nebraska and Nevada show higher salaries in growing industries than contracting industries.

New England

Maine
$27,963
$37,364
(25)%

New Hampshire
29,559
45,750
(35)

Vermont
29,070
40,976
(29)

Massachusetts
34,640
58,759
(41)

Rhode Island
26,115
39,483
(34)

Connecticut
36,300
54,136
(33)

Middle Atlantic

New York
34,081
54,537
(38)

New Jersey
34,401
55,952
(39)

Pennsylvania
31,055
40,175
(23)

East North Central

Ohio
29,418
41,287
(29)

Indiana
28,008
38,381
(27)

Illinois
30,879
46,533
(34)

Michigan
36,477
49,397
(26)

Wisconsin
31,343
38,553
(19)

West North Central

Minnesota
29,780
42,135
(29)

Iowa
29,073
35,931
(19)

Missouri
30,059
40,223
(25)

N. Dakota
23,640
30,450
(22)

S. Dakota
22,561
30,362
(26)

Nebraska
32,289
30,952
4

Kansas
30,284
41,185
(26)

South Atlantic

Delaware
28,407
49,609
(43)

Maryland
32,535
48,008
(32)

Dist. Of Columbia
42,413
62,721
(32)

Virginia
29,375
46,323
(37)

W. Virginia
22,805
33,832
(33)

N. Carolina
33,926
38,041
(11)

S. Carolina
31,012
36,986
(16)

Georgia
34,418
44,481
(23)

Florida
29,979
35,353
(15)

East South Central

Kentucky
29,035
37,371
(22)

Tennessee
31,844
36,881
(14)

Alabama
28,584
36,577
(22)

Mississippi
26,764
30,638
(13)

West South Central

Arkansas
27,256
31,869
(14)

Louisiana
26,408
39,550
(33)

Oklahoma
25,259
35,917
(30)

Texas
31,663
48,751
(35)

Mountain

Montana
22,698
32,001
(29)

Idaho
29.593
34,188
(13)

Wyoming
25,161
41,819
(40)

Colorado
33,223
50,914
(35)

New Mexico
27,784
36,122
(23)

Arizona
32,937
46,415
(29)

Utah
30,454
36,563
(17)

Nevada
37,857
34,866
9

Pacific

Washington
36,838
52,351
(30)

Oregon
29,964
40,991
(27)

California
34,742
57,800
(40)

Alaska
35,969
58,420
(38)

Hawaii
33,328
35,557
(6)



To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (16826)2/6/2004 2:32:52 PM
From: Lizzie TudorRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
you got it, good for you
I also think GDP is just plain wrong, I think it is too difficult to gauge how much of a US companies' output is really done in the US with all this offshoring. The statistics seem like they are taking goods from Applied Materials, where you have 3 US managers and 50 offshore- and allocating the *entire* product to the US.



To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (16826)2/6/2004 3:49:50 PM
From: gpowellRespond to of 306849
 
Wages and labor productivity are well correlated in the long-run, but not so well correlated in the short-run – particularly during and after recessions.