Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorne who wrote (24180)	2/8/2004 10:27:55 AM
From: haqihana	Respond to of 27666

lorne, He's made of snips, snails, and puppy dog tails with a lot a bark, and no bite. I see that Canada has it's share of deluded, left wing, piglets wanting to suck at the government's tit, and then bite it if the milk doesn't taste as he would like it. Ain't that a bitch?? :^)

To: lorne who wrote (24180)	2/9/2004 12:19:11 AM
From: Richnorth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27666

Once again, you are barking up the wrong tree. It is pretty obvious you have not been reading the posts I have put on the threads. If you do not understand the articles, go back to school and take some courses to help you along. Oh, and by the way, if my memory serves, you have been told to do that quite a while ago. According to your logic in your past posts going back several years, it would appear that Americans are honest good folks and only Americans have the right to kill others, wage war and plot all sorts of things against them, and that any backlash and consequences in retaliation against American action is therefore unjustified and is to be considered as "unprovoked" or "without excuse". What cockeyed logic is that? How idiotic can you get? AND it would also appear that only deaths of Americans count big time and that the deaths of others are of no consequence. Yea, about 3,000 Americans died on 9/11/01. But the number of Iraqis and others who died as a result of US sanctions, bombing and whatnot far outnumber the ~3,000 by many, many times over! And surely many of them were not even enemies of the US. Is it not natural that hostile action invites retaliation? and that whenever there is smoke there is fire and vice versa? Because you seem unable to comprehend these simple facts, I called you an idiot. I don't feel big at all in calling you that. Rather I feel sad I have to open your eyes to what you have been. I call a spade a spade: nothing more and nothing less. You think illogically and you expect others to follow you in ovine fashion. Seems to me your long association with sheep has caused you to act and think like one of them. Do what you like but don't expect others to be like you. As for Chretien going to the US, he did that for political reasons for the sake of the political ends of his friends. I am sure that, on his own, he would not not have done that. Jean Chretien is not an idiot!!! He said it rightly that it was the US that brought retaliation on its head, and the history and voluminous analyses following 9/11 all point to US machinations and provocation. Read the articles I have posted recently! By the way, the US could have prevented 9/11 but it didn't. That alone says quite a lot, doesn't it? If there is a super-idiot, he is Lorne, not Chretien. Duh! To redeem yourself, you should be producing more lamb instead of continually barking up the wrong tree.