Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (28478)	2/8/2004 6:17:25 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 794503

"If it were possible to set aside the arguments of the gay marriage issue, how many Americans really believe that four out of seven appointed officials should make that decision for everyone for all time? " I think it is premature for judges to get involved to this extent, until the culture is more on the side of gay marriage. Brown vs Bd of Ed couldnt have occurred 10 years earlier, even though it would have been the right thing to do. This is a tough issue and its more about money and family than it is about biblical issues of morality. The benefits that go to married folks with children shouldnt be given to others unless they have children. But that not right either because married folks get help prior to kids to encourage them to have a couple of kids. mike PS for this election i will be a one issue guy. I will just have to live with all the rest.