SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (28480)2/8/2004 6:20:06 PM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 793928
 
Because i(and i assume so many others) am so confused about this issue, a constitutional amendment is too final an act in a time when views are being altered. The real decision lies with SCOTUS and the DMA act. Just like in 2000 when they saved america from algore. mike



To: DMaA who wrote (28480)2/8/2004 6:20:58 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793928
 
I'm sorry I was not clear. I was talking about a Constitutional amendment, meaning the US Constitution. I don't mind them amending the Mass constitution.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News