Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BEEF JERKEY who wrote (537290)	2/8/2004 7:44:46 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Respond to of 769670

Bush's opponents are bent on overt treason as no opposition before in American history has been. They have lost every argument, and have thus retreated into the pattern of Leninist lying and revisionism that murdered hundreds of millions in the 20th century. It's become an exclusive reliance on cashing in on the massive ignorance they have worked for decades to create through class-hatred, racism, and feel-good arrogant treason. The American people are faced with the duty of PURGEING the anti-American Democrat left, and time is now running short for them...

To: BEEF JERKEY who wrote (537290)	2/8/2004 7:47:14 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Here's a dead giveaway: In the Sunday Meet the Press Interview, Tim Russet asked Bush [paraphrased] "Is the war in Iraq a war of choice or a war of necessity?" Bush pauses, somewhat quasi-dumbfounded, and begging time for his reply, he says, "Can you elaborate on that?" The question is repeated. Bush says, "Oh, necessary," in a weak air of confidence, thinking that he got the multiple choice question correct. Bush couldn't even give an immediate answer to this question! Is this a giveaway? I mean what can be more obvious? That a president of the United States would ask for elaboration to such a question? Just consider what America's Gold Star Mothers will think about his response to this answer!!! This exchange should become a soundbite heard far and wide!

To: BEEF JERKEY who wrote (537290)	2/8/2004 8:38:35 PM
From: Kenneth V. McNutt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

The man is a lying moron: You seem to have things mixed up. President Bush's actions were the result of information passed on to him from the moron of the previous administration. Now, I admit, that moron, Bill Clinton, could have been under serious duress attempting to ward of the charges of rape, indecent exposure, lying under oath, missing files,etc., and trying to explain all this to the Battle Axe, Shillary. Poor fellow, so it is understandable he passed on poor information. What we had was 96 months of misfeasance and malfeasance under Clinton, 96 months of constant attacks against interests and citizens of the United States, and he was too moronic to learn from WTC One, treating it as a civil affair. In other words, he had the same information as given to President Bush and failed in his sworn duty, to protect the citizens of the United States. Bill Clinton wouldn't make a pimple on a mans ass, a poor excuse for a human being, and anyone who thinks differently is evading the truth. The sleaziest President ever, hands down. He belongs with the other morons such as Michael Moore and company. KM