SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dayuhan who wrote (28541)2/9/2004 3:13:40 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793670
 
They were granted the privilege of establishing a State, a privilege that had never been granted to anyone before under remotely similar circumstances, and has never been granted to anyone since under remotely similar

No, Stephen, first they bought the land and built their state, for seventy years of Zionist development before 1948, reclaiming desert, marshland and scrub in a backwater province of Syria. First under the Turks, then under the British. Only after their state was built did the UN partition the land when the Brits threw up their hands and tossed the problem to the UN. A state is not a patch of land, Stephen. It is an idea in the heads of a people. The Zionists had it. The Arabs of Palestine, who at the time did not yet call themselves Palestinians, did not have the idea, and instead of claiming their state, called on the Arab armies to slaughter the Jews.

Anybody else who wants a state will also need to build it first. The Kurds seem to be doing a good job of it; I hope they get their state in the end. If the Tutsis want a state, they will have to build it too.

And yes, the European treatment of the Jews made it necessary, well before that treatment culminated in the Holocaust.

The double standard you speak of emanates from a small number of angst-ridden intellectuals with no influence over anything

Bullshit, Stephen. It permeates nearly every bit of reporting that comes from the Middle East, as all these reporters live their cushy ex-pat lives in the one place in the Mideast where can report without fear, and go off to let their Palestinian finders give them the names and numbers to fill in today's story of Jewish oppressors and Palestinian helpless victims. Where else does the axiomatic assumption come from that Jewish oppression is outrageus, even in self-defense against terrorism, but Palestinian barbarism is excusable because they are 'helpless' or 'desperate'?