Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam who wrote (124532)	2/9/2004 8:05:29 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 281500

"Making America Secure Again: Setting the Right Course for Foreign Policy" cfr.org

To: Sam who wrote (124532)	2/9/2004 12:55:11 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Sam Scott Ritter not only only took money from Saddam - it's now been proven - he switched from being one of the strongest voices for the danger of Saddam's programs in 1999 to claiming he was no danger in 2001 - with no inspections in between, no new knowledge, no explanation of why he flipped his story 180 degrees. Check out this interview from 1999: pbs.org Worst of all, when anybody asks Ritter why he changed his story, he denies that he ever did! Tenet is dependent on Bush for fights for himself. Everybody in Washington knows an A1 survivor when he sees one. Kay has been quite frank and independent, and since he's just quit his job is dependent on no one in particular. That dog won't hunt.