Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (10362)	2/9/2004 10:02:11 AM
From: mopgcw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52153

i did not read the book (did not know it existed, but i did follow the case closely, as i thought cell-pro had a great system and was looking to buy the stock. If i remember correctly, the jury found for cpro, and was reversed. i always wondered, why they never came to a settlement. it did have a lot of david/goliath bad company squashing the better little guy aura, because cpro was far ahead of baxter with a working system and the optics of big baxter and little cellpro...i was also surprised the govt did not support cpro on the under bayh-dole. man, talk about dusting off cobwebs...