SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (28680)2/9/2004 8:42:26 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 793955
 
I can't point you to any studies right off the top of my head but countries like Great Britain where traditionally only the oldest son inherited the land were more prosperous than countries where each male child got a share, like Ireland. Even more so, probably, where great estates were entailed and couldn't be broken up.

Compare and contrast to countries where an estate needs to be divided among the children of four wives! Some of whom have life estates (allowed to live there until they die).

In the polygamous societies I studied in anthropology, only one was polyandrous - I think it was in Tibet. The polygynous ones all had the richest oldest men cornering the market in wives, with poorer older men marrying widows, and poor young men sneaking around with married women.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (28680)2/10/2004 10:01:49 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793955
 
and hey, there would be no grounds to outlaw polyandry, either, right?)

Yes, I conspicuously and intentionally confined my comments to traditional polygamous relationships. I agree that that would complicate things.