To: Bill Jackson who wrote (1272 ) 2/10/2004 12:16:17 AM From: Lizzie Tudor Read Replies (2) | Respond to read steven roach's latest for a little more detail... I agree with Roach, you apparently don't but it is a good perspective at any rate. Middle class white collar jobs in the US are desk jobs that pay between 50-100K and these are being outsourced, en masse, to india. The people left behind are settling for much less than they had before, and the downward spiral continues. I say no recovery in the job market, and no US based capex recovery until this stops.Let’s face it: The Great American Job Machine has finally met its match. — that the payrolls-based survey of business establishments simply misses miss the inherent dynamism of risk-taking entrepreneurs whose enthusiasm for hiring can only be captured in the so-called household survey. Yes, the household-based job count is up 1.4 million workers in the 12 months ending January 2004 — well in excess of the paltry gain of 6,000 as measured by the establishment survey. According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, a little more than 25% of that discrepancy can be traced to definitional differences between the two surveys — namely a household survey that includes the self-employed, unpaid family workers, and private household staff. But the remainder of the difference could well be a perceptual one — disaffected workers sampled in the household survey who have downgraded their aspirations and simply won’t admit to the tougher reality depicted by businesses in the establishment survey. Yet there is really no comparison in the sampling accuracy of these two surveys. According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, the “active sample” of some 400,000 establishments in the payroll data covers about one-third of the total universe of such workers; by contrast, the monthly sample of only 60,000 households covers only 0.0006% of the universe of over 106 million households in the United States. There is no doubt in my mind as to which of these two surveys should be trusted. The details of the just-released January payroll employment survey hint at just such a possibility: Job losses were evident in a host of service sector categories that are prime candidates for offshoring — namely, accounting and bookkeeping (-18,000), business support services (-8,000), architects and engineers (-2,500), legal services (-800), and computer systems design (-600). For these areas, combined, US headcount is essentially unchanged over the past 12 months. At the same time, our calculations suggest that payrolls in America’s IT and information services segment are currently running about 350,000 below the profile of the recovery of the early 1990s — not exactly what would normally be expected of an increasingly IT-intensive US economy. Halfway around the world, anecdotal reports abound of surging employment in India’s IT-enabled export sector. In my view, these two seemingly disparate trends in America and India are not a coincidence — they are part and parcel of the same global labor arbitrage. morganstanley.com
