Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (537867)	2/10/2004 12:34:21 AM
From: CYBERKEN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

<<you have no idea what I 'support'>> That makes two of you. But since you are the thread moron, you have an excuse...

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (537867)	2/10/2004 10:42:01 AM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Please...you post here incessantly, and whenever the issue of forcing people by law to grant rights to Sodomites not on the basis of their humanity, but on the basis of their corrupt practice of putting their penises into one another's anuses, you are amongst the very first to come out in favor of it. That is not moderate. It is radical and it is found way over in the very far left. Even a scientist can understand your views here. Wrong on two counts. Firstly, not a 'leftist' (small government, low tax, fiscal conservative... pro strong national defense and with strongly Libertarian views) You deceive yourself, and/or you try to deceive me - a thing you simply cannot do. Very many leftists try to pass themselves off as "moderates" simply because they claim a desire to save money. The fact is, if you wish to save money but also wish to fashion law that would force society to in any way acknowledge a man's taking his penis and stuffing it into another man's anus, you are nothing but a filthy, radical and immoral leftist. All I pointed out --- and again, there are much better sources for this information then the NYT, which is aimed at a non-scientific audience --- is the widespread occurance of multitudes of sexual expression and behaviors throughout the animal kingdom ('homosexuality' among them). It is not, and never has been, a uniquely human behavior. Never claimed homosexual behavior was “uniquely human.” Defects are found in all creatures, humans included. I instead claimed that homosexual nature does not exist because it is biological fact that no human has a natural existence formed by the biological components of two men or two women. This is a fact that has no exception at all, that has never had a single exception for the entire duration of human history, and that never will. Your claim that homosexuality is “widespread” is an immoral leftist fantasy, pure wishful thinking – a corrupt play on words crafted by leftists to deceive. Merely because homosexuality occurs in some few animals, like retardation and deformity, is no legitimate reason to claim it is “widespread.” Heterosexual behavior is widespread, since it is found in almost all of the higher animal species. In fact it is found even in many plants and lower species of creatures. Heterosexuality is the norm for our class. It is widespread. Homosexuality is an anomaly. It is aberrant. You are soooooo eager for smelly penises, you cannot even perceive the sublime freshness of truth right under your filthy nose.