Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (5722)	2/10/2004 7:57:52 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

I doubt it. Can you say short squeeze? "Medinah shares rose three-hundredths of a cent to a half-cent on Monday on the OTC Bulletin Board, on volume of 1.17 million shares."

To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (5722)	2/10/2004 9:51:55 AM
From: Handshake™	Respond to of 12465

LOL....doggy style is not my preferred position if that is where you were going with that. Les won plain and simple. The case was very weak and it makes one wonder WHAT is really or WHO is really behind trying to tackle Medinah. They took a good shot at Les and lost. The SEC has plenty of sworn testimony to filter through and if anything is out of place why don't they step in and shut Medinah down. The problem is what has been happening for the last 6 years with the illegal naked shorting and lack of SEC oversite. People like Eliot Spitzer should step up and show the world what our NASD, DTC, and SEC have been up too lately......