Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (538025)	2/10/2004 12:16:37 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

PLS seek help for your mental aberations! (You know, the ones that cause you to impute motives and thoughts to other people that perhaps only exist within the refractory confines of your own skull.....) Sick Puppy, Johannes, you are a very sick puppy! Now, as to the ONE thing in your post --- aside from your unfortunate state of mental health --- that is deserving of comment, it is clear from the following excerpts that you have failed to clearly understand the logical implications of your own statement. That is worth explaining: Your statement "I instead claimed that homosexual nature does not exist because it is biological fact that no human has a natural existence formed by the biological components of two men or two women." I explained that your statement Lamarkism at it's most primitive and foolish. You answered; "Oh please. This is just dumb. I make no comment at all on the inheritability of acquired traits during the lifetime of any organism." So answer this --- behaviors clearly do NOT alter our genetic makeup (that is the discredited Lamarkian concept)... so where do persistent and reoccuring human behaviors come from? (Clearly, our genetic makeup influences many behaviors... as it does for all creatures.) I said: "If behaviors are genetically informed... then they are inheritable. Period." And you answered: "This is just dumb. Behaviors may not (and very likely are not) strictly formed by genetics, but are likely formed by genetics and environmental influences upon genetics." >>> Here you are getting very slippery. You ostensably disagree with what I said... then you close by agreeing with exactly what I have maintained ('formed by genetics and environmental influences upon genetics').