Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J-R who wrote (27873)	2/12/2004 1:19:49 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39344

The property yes partly, the name 'Kirkland Lake' more, rang an old bell with me, sounds fairly promotable ..... they're after more claims elsewhere now though [yesterday's news], plus they have the Red Lake claim ... can't say i know this thing in any depth, but it appealed in a number of ways, fairly low shares out, it's built some sort of base here in the .teens, plus it didn't hurt that EC liked it .... also, its name lends itself to songmaking -g- .... i dunno, it was a general hunch thing, hard to explain .... there will be a weight of new paper out there, and more coming, as they don't have much cash in treasury Today i wish i'd stuck in the dmw.to instead -g- ...... i haven't made anywhere near a scientific study of all choices, by the way, only looked at very few companies in the last months, far less than a normal winter ... and that post to Michael was just spur of the moment, not thought out at all carefully ..... of the three there, i think Cadre has the most whiz-bang potential, but it's the iffiest as well, they maybe get stiffed on those permits and the thing is a shell, poof .... but even so, it should just go to a nickel, then eventually somebody does something with it