To: John Carragher who wrote (29127 ) 2/12/2004 7:24:21 AM From: LindyBill Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793990 Oh, sure. Just the person you want speaking up for you. Jane Fonda defends Kerry By MARLON MANUEL The Atlanta Journal-Constitution Published on: 02/11/04 Democratic front-runner John Kerry's Vietnam War protests and President Bush's military service during that distant era were a hot topic on Wednesday. Radio commentators and Internet posters circulated a 34-year-old photo of Kerry attending an anti-war rally while seated near actress Jane Fonda. (Fonda's trip to Hanoi in 1972 and her opposition to the Vietnam War made her a vilified figure among many veterans.) The photo from a 1970 Labor Day rally in Valley Forge, Pa., shows Fonda in the foreground, with Kerry, a former Navy lieutenant, a few rows behind. The picture is prominently posted, among other places, on the Web sites of conservative commentators Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. Fonda defended Kerry during an interview Wednesday on CNN. "Any attempts to link Kerry to me and to make him look bad with that connection is completely false," Fonda said. "We were at a rally for veterans at the same time. I spoke. Donald Sutherland spoke. John Kerry spoke at the end. I don't even think we shook hands. "And they're also saying this organization, Vietnam Veterans Against the War, was a Communist organization. This was an organization of men who risked their lives in Vietnam, who consider themselves totally patriotic. And anyone who slams that organization and slams Kerry for being a part of it is doing an injustice to veterans. "How can you impugn, how can you even suggest that a Vietnam veteran like Kerry, or any of them, are not patriotic? He was a hero there," she added. Later, in an interview on CNN's "Paula Zahn Now," Fonda blamed "a narrow, extremely conservative, right-wing segment" for circulating the photo and linking Kerry with her. "I don't think it flies with most Americans and I think we are going to see that I'm right there." Meanwhile, Bush's record with the National Guard in the early 1970s continued to receive scrutiny Wednesday. In question is whether he reported for duty over periods that lasted several months. During a House hearing on the State Department budget, Rep. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) suggested to Secretary of State Colin Powell that the "president may have been AWOL." A snippy exchange ensued. "I won't dignify your comments about the president, because you don't know what you're talking about," said Powell, a retired four-star general. "I'm sorry. I don't know what you mean, Mr. Secretary," Brown replied. "You made reference to the president . . ." Powell said. " . . . Said he may have been AWOL," Brown responded. "Mr. Brown, let's not go there," Powell said. "Let's not just go there. Let's not go there in this hearing. You want to have a political fight on this matter that's very controversial, and I think is being dealt with by the White House, fine. But let's not go there." Brown's "AWOL" characterization echoes the words of Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe, who tried to make the phrase stick earlier this month. White House press secretary Scott McClellan accused Democrats of "gutter politics." "There are some who are not interested in the facts," McClellan said. "They are simply trolling for trash" for political gain. You expect the garbage to be thrown at you in the eleventh hour of a campaign, but not nine months before Election Day." Also Wednesday, McCellan hinted there may be limits as to how much of Bush's service record the White House will be willing to release. In a weekend interview, the president pledged to hand over anything that would help settle the controversy. The Democratic National Committee wants to see Bush's complete National Guard personnel file. McCelland said the Pentagon is seeking the record, but he didn't say whether any of it would be released. Find this article at: ajc.com