SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (539190)2/12/2004 11:50:42 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 769670
 
The Khan Artist

February 12, 2004
OP-ED COLUMNIST
By MAUREEN DOWD
nytimes.com

WASHINGTON

I think President Bush has cleared up everything now.

The U.S. invaded Iraq, which turned out not to have what our pals in Pakistan did have and were giving out willy-nilly to all the bad guys except Iraq, which wouldn't take it.

Bush officials thought they knew what was going on inside our enemy's country: that Iraq had W.M.D. and might sell them on the black market. But they were wrong.

Bush officials thought they knew what was going on inside our friend's country: that Pakistanis were trying to sell W.M.D. on the black market. But they couldn't prove it — until about the time we were invading Iraq.

"The grave and gathering threat" turned out to be not Saddam's mushroom cloud but the president's mushrooming deficits.

The president is having just as hard a time finding his National Guard records as Iraqi W.M.D. — and those pay stubs look as murky as those satellite photos of trucks in Iraq.

Mr. Bush said yesterday that smaller developing countries must stop developing nuclear fuel, even as the U.S. develops a whole new arsenal of smaller nuclear weapons to use against smaller developing countries that might be thinking about developing nuclear fuel.

After he weakened the U.N. for telling the truth about Iraq's nonexistent W.M.D., Mr. Bush now calls on the U.N. to be strong going after W.M.D.

Gen. Pervez Musharraf pardoned the Pakistani hero and nuclear huckster Abdul Qadeer Khan after an embarrassing debacle, praising the scientist's service to his country. Mr. Bush pardoned George Tenet after an embarrassing debacle, praising the spook's service to his country. (So much for Mr. Bush's preachy odes to responsibility and accountability.)

The president warned yesterday that "the greatest threat before humanity" is the possibility of a sudden W.M.D. attack. Not wanting nuclear technology to go to North Korea, Iran or Libya, the White House demanded tighter controls on black-market sales of W.M.D., even while praising its good buddy Pakistan, whose scientists were running a black market like a Sam's Club for nukes, peddling to North Korea, Iran and Libya.

Mr. Bush likes to present the world in black and white, as good and evil, even as he's made a Faustian deal with General Musharraf, perhaps hoping that one day — maybe even on an October day — the cagey general will decide to cough up Osama.

The president is spending $1.5 billion to persuade more Americans to have happy married lives, but plans to keep gay Americans from having happy married lives.

Mr. Bush said he wouldn't try to overturn abortion rights. But John Ashcroft is intimidating women who had certain abortions by subpoenaing records in six hospitals in New York, Philadelphia and elsewhere.

The president set up the intelligence commission (with few intelligence experts) because, he said, the best intelligence is needed to win the war on terror. Yet he doesn't want us to get the panel's crucial report until after he's won the war on Kerry.

Mr. Bush said he had balked at giving the 9/11 commission the records of his daily briefings from the C.I.A. until faced with a subpoena threat because it might deter the C.I.A. from giving the president "good, honest information." Wasn't it such "good, honest information" that caused him to miss 9/11 and mobilize the greatest war machine in history against Saddam's empty cupboard?

Mr. Bush says he's working hard to create new jobs in America, while his top economist says it's healthy for jobs to be shipped overseas.

The president told Tim Russert that if you order a country to disarm and it doesn't and you don't act, you lose face. But how does a country that goes to war to disarm a country without arms get back its face?

Mr. Bush said he was troubled that the Vietnam War was "a political war," because civilian politicians didn't let the generals decide how to fight it. But when Gen. Eric Shinseki presciently told Congress in February 2003 that postwar Iraq would need several hundred thousand U.S. soldiers to keep it secure and supplied, he was swatted down by the Bush administration's civilian politicians.

Yes, it all makes perfect sense, through the Bush looking glass.

E-mail: liberties@nytimes.com

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (539190)2/12/2004 11:52:13 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 769670
 
Move to Screen Bush File in 90's Is Reported

February 12, 2004
By RALPH BLUMENTHAL
nytimes.com

HOUSTON, Feb. 11 — A retired lieutenant colonel in the Texas National Guard complained to a member of the Texas Senate in 1998 that aides to Gov. George W. Bush improperly screened Mr. Bush's National Guard files in a search for information that could embarrass the governor in future elections.

The retired officer, Bill Burkett, said in the letter to Senator Gonzalo Barrientos, a Democrat from Austin, that Dan Bartlett, then a senior aide to Governor Bush and now White House communications director, and Gen. Daniel James, then the head of the Texas National Guard, reviewed the file to "make sure nothing will embarrass the governor during his re-election campaign."

A copy of the letter was provided to The New York Times by a lawyer for Mr. Burkett to support statements he makes in a book to be published this month, which Mr. Burkett repeated in interviews this week, that Mr. Bush's aides ordered Guard officials to remove damaging information from Mr. Bush's military personnel files.

Mr. Bartlett denied on Wednesday that any records were altered. General James, since named head of the Air National Guard by President Bush, also denied Mr. Burkett's account. But Mr. Bartlett and another former official in Mr. Bush's administration in Texas, Joe Allbaugh, acknowledged speaking to National Guard officials about the files as Mr. Bush was preparing to seek re-election as governor.

Both said their goal was to ensure that the records would be helpful to journalists who inquired about Mr. Bush's military experience.

Questions about Mr. Bush's service in the National Guard have arisen in every campaign he has run since his 1994 race for governor. His 2004 re-election campaign is no different, as Democrats have pointed to apparent gaps in his service record with the National Guard.

On Tuesday, the White House released 18 months of payroll records that it says demonstrate that Mr. Bush fully completed his service. And on Wednesday, the White House spokesman, Scott McClellan, said the administration was awaiting more records and promised to make public any previously undisclosed information from the file.

Mr. McClellan and other administration officials criticized the Democrats for their attacks on Mr. Bush's service in the National Guard during the Vietnam War. "What you are seeing is gutter politics," Mr. McClellan said. "The American people deserve better. There are some who are not interested in their facts. They are simply trolling for trash."

Mr. Burkett's letter to Senator Barrientos was part of a running battle that he waged with the National Guard after retiring in January 1998. In it, Mr. Burkett complained of "severe retaliation" from General James for what he said was reporting "illegal acts" within the National Guard. He also complained about the government's failure to pay for his medical care after suffering from a tropical disease after a military assignment to Panama in 1997. Before finally winning medical benefits in July 1998, he said, he suffered a nervous breakdown and was hospitalized for depression.

A spokesman for Senator Barrientos, Ray Perez, said on Wednesday that "Mr. Burkett did correspond with this office." Senator Barrientos said he was trying to find the six-year-old records of contacts with Mr. Burkett. Another Texas legislator contacted at the time by Mr. Burkett, Representative Bob Hunter, Republican of Abilene, said Mr. Burkett had appeared before his committee overseeing military affairs and had complained of mishandling of his medical claims but did not mention Mr. Bush's files. He called Mr. Burkett "disgruntled."

In telephone interviews this week from his home near Abilene, Mr. Burkett, 55, a systems analyst with 27 years in the National Guard including service as deputy commandant of the New Mexico Military Academy, said he happened to be in General James' office at Camp Mabry in Austin in mid-1997 and overheard Mr. Allbaugh on a speakerphone telling General James that Mr. Bartlett and Karen P. Hughes, another aide to Governor Bush, would be coming to the Guard offices to review Mr. Bush's military files.

Ms. Hughes, who left the White House in 2002, did not return a call.

Mr. James said though a spokesman that "that discussion never happened" and that he would "never condone falsification of any record." Mr. Allbaugh called the account "pure hogwash," but said he talked to General James about making Mr. Bush's records available to reporters.

"We spoke about a lot of things," Mr. Allbaugh said. "I'm sure we had a conversation with General James where all the records were kept because it was an issue in 1994 and 1998 and would be in 2000. We wanted to make sure we could refer people of your profession where to go."

Mr. Burkett further said that about 10 days later he and another officer walked into the Camp Mabry military museum and saw the head of the museum, Gen. John Scribner, going through Mr. Bush's personnel records. Mr. Burkett said he saw a trash basket with discarded papers bearing Mr. Bush's name. Mr. Burkett said the papers appeared to be "retirement point certificates, pay documents, that sort of thing."

General Scribner dismissed the account. "It never happened as far as I know," he said. "Why would I be going into records?"

Mr. Burkett is quoted at length in a book to come out by the end of the month, "Bush's War for Re-election" by James Moore, a former Texas television reporter and co-author of "Bush's Brain."

The other Guard officer who Mr. Burkett says was with him the day he saw General Scribner going though the records, George Conn, declined in an e-mail message to comment on Mr. Burkett's statements. But Mr. Conn, a former chief warrant officer for the Texas Guard and now a civilian on duty with American forces in Europe, said: "I know LTC Bill Burkett and served with him several years ago in the Texas Army National Guard. I believe him to be honest and forthright. He `calls things like he sees them.' "

A retired officer, Lt. Col. Dennis Adams, said Mr. Burkett told him of the incidents shortly after they happened. "We talked about them several different times," said Mr. Adams, who spent 15 years in the Texas Guard and 12 years on active duty in the Army. He now works for the Texas Department of Public Safety as a security officer guarding the state Capitol.

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (539190)2/12/2004 11:52:56 AM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 769670
 
Bush packin the panel as USUAL
Senate May Broaden Its Iraq Inquiry
A panel investigating prewar intelligence failures may look at how the White House used spy agencies' data to
make its case for war.

By Greg Miller, Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON — The Senate Intelligence Committee is considering
expanding the scope of its investigation of intelligence failures in Iraq to include
the White House's use of the information in making its case for war, according
to congressional sources familiar with the probe.

If the expansion is approved at a full meeting of the panel scheduled for today,
it would mark a reversal for the White House and Republican congressional
leaders, who have fought to limit the inquiry to the performance of the CIA
and other spy agencies.

The possibility of
expanding the inquiry
gained new life this week
amid signs that one or
more of the committee's
Republican members
now may be inclined to
support long-standing
Democratic demands for
an examination of the
White House's role, the
congressional sources
said.

Key members of the panel were engaged in
lengthy negotiations on the issue in a closed-door
meeting on Capitol Hill on Wednesday. Among those involved was Sen. Charles Hagel (R-Neb.), who
several sources said was considering whether to back an expanded probe.

Mike Buttry, a spokesman for Hagel, confirmed that the senator participated in Wednesday's meeting
and said the topic was "about where do we go from here with the intelligence committee report." But he
declined to say whether Hagel supported expanding the investigation.

Because Republicans control the committee, Democrats would need to attract GOP support to expand
the scope of the probe. An aide to a Democrat on the committee said other negotiations also were
underway, and described the talks as intense. "There are groups all over the place meeting, and deals
being brokered right and left," the aide said.

But congressional sources in both parties stressed that no deal had been struck.

Other participants in the meeting Wednesday were committee Chairman Pat Roberts (R-Kan.), Vice
Chairman John D. "Jay" Rockefeller IV (D-WVa and Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.). Spokeswomen for
Roberts and Levin did not return calls seeking comment. A spokeswoman for Rockefeller declined to
comment.

The committee announced the start of the inquiry in June. It has spent several months poring over
thousands of intelligence documents and conducting dozens of interviews in preparing a report that is
said to be sharply critical of the CIA and other agencies for their assessments that Iraq had stockpiles
of biological and chemical weapons. No such stockpiles have been found.

Roberts and other Republicans repeatedly have resisted calls to examine whether the Bush
administration exaggerated the Iraqi threat or pressured intelligence analysts to take positions
supporting the administration's views. But a series of recent developments has put new pressure on
Roberts and others to give ground.

David Kay, who recently resigned as the leader of the U.S. weapons search team in Iraq, said last
week that he supported an investigation of the administration's use of intelligence. Kay testified before
Congress that intelligence on Iraq was "wrong" and that he didn't believe Baghdad had weapons
stockpiles when the United States invaded last year.

CIA Director George J. Tenet added to the White House's troubles last week when he defended the
agency's performance, saying it never portrayed Iraq as an imminent threat.

President Bush and others in his administration repeatedly cast Iraq as a "grave and gathering" danger
to the United States.

Seeking to end the controversy, Bush last week appointed an independent commission to assess
intelligence.

But Democrats have criticized the panel's makeup and complained that it wouldn't examine the
administration's use of intelligence.

CC