To: russwinter who wrote (7860 ) 2/12/2004 2:43:42 PM From: ild Respond to of 110194 Date: Thu Feb 12 2004 14:38 trotsky (kapex@inflation) ID#377387: Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved rising prices are a SYMPTOM of inflation - they are not, per se, inflation. prices often rise for reasons not connected to inflation - like e.g. unexpected supply disruptions, or simply entrepreneurial mistakes in gauging future supply/demand balances. the correct definition of inflation is a rise in the money supply. when the money supply falls, that's called deflation. falling prices, the symptom of deflation, come later - it takes time for the effects of changes in the money supply to filter through to the economy at large. furthermore, you seem to be referring to aggregate prices. if so, you must not only consider those goods the prices of which have been rising lately, but also those that have exhibited falling prices. there is e.g. not a single electronics good the price of which has not plunged dramatically. apparel prices are coming down continuously, as are the prices of telecommunications and travel. likewise, the price of labor has been falling, as evidence by negative wage growth over the past 3 years. the price of money has come down a lot as well ( i.e., interest rates ) . so the assertion that all prices are rising is wrong in any case, even if one doesn't consider the correct interpretation of inflation. Date: Thu Feb 12 2004 14:21 trotsky (morbius, 12:54) ID#377387: Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved regarding helicoper money - perhaps. but i actually think that's highly unlikely, because the central banks will be reluctant to print themselves out of a job. i also suspect that by the time it may actually become a point of consideration, the worries and priorities won't concern those unkeepable government promises anymore. i for one ( please don't tell anybody ) don't think our current social order will survive the coming upheavals.