Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mph who wrote (182489)	2/12/2004 2:56:52 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575775

Clinton also said he had asked Vice President Al Gore to delay a planned trip to South Africa next week so he can have his full national security team on hand if the United States decides to attack Iraq. Do you think Clinton would invade Iraq if he had UN inspectors in the country with unprecedented access and the UN for which they worked asking for more time to search for weapons? Al

To: mph who wrote (182489)	2/12/2004 5:15:23 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1575775

If you are honest, you will see that there is a big difference between the position of the Bushes vs the position of the Clintons. The Clintons saw Saddam as a threat but they did not propose that we go to war over it. Understandably.......Saddam was not all that dangerous to us nor an immediate threat to anyone else for that matter. And that's because the sanctions were working. Here's an article with extensive quotes from Clinton regarding the resolve of the U.S. to deal with Saddam, by force, if necessary: Did Clinton attack Iraq? He had ample opportunity to do it. Why do you think he did not? ted