Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (182514)	2/12/2004 9:24:24 PM
From: Road Walker	Respond to of 1575980

Ten, re: The same applies to Khaddafi, yet he decided it was in his best interest to get along with America. Why not Saddam? The way you describe it, you make him sound like a victim. Call me cynical. It's crossed my mind that Khaddafi fooled around with wmd, then gave in, all for political/economic reasons. He hasn't been much of a threat for years. I'm probably wrong, still... John

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (182514)	2/12/2004 10:13:44 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1575980

The same applies to Khaddafi, yet he decided it was in his best interest to get along with America. Why not Saddam? The way you describe it, you make him sound like a victim. Libya is broke. Khaddafi has little choice. Libya is one of the few nations in the world that we do not have income data. I suspect the people are making a couple hundred dollars per year on average. And once again, let me repeat........Saddam was complying. That's why I asked you what were you expecting. ted