Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: geode00 who wrote (2121)	2/13/2004 3:02:24 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

I think Souter writes hooey there...re: ""The vote was Tony Kennedy's. One justice had picked the president."" Obviously, others among the judges could have voted differently. Obviously, had they decided to take the time to re-count fairly, it is NOT a given that Gore would have won. Sadly, Gore's recount requests were never for fair counting, but rather for stilted counting(again, as ruled upon 7-2 by the Supreme Court). Had Gore asked for something fair and by the rules from the start, things may have worked out differently(I'd respect him much more, for one thing). He is the Candidate who is guilty hands down without further research or evidence, of being ridiculously unfair in asking only for unprecedented unconstitutional forms of counting. The above quoted is so much poppycock. Dan B.