SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (29244)2/12/2004 8:38:31 PM
From: gamesmistress  Respond to of 793794
 
All sorts of ways to look at "who leaked what and when." Andrew Sullivan said this:

THE LEWINSKY PATH: I'm beginning to worry that the Republicans might be behind this smear-job on Kerry. So does a reader: (long email edited out).

Then he posts:

NO, JONAH: I have absolutely no idea where this Kerry story came from. I posted the letter below because it strikes me as a slightly new angle on the story and worth airing. I wrote that the possibility that some Republicans might be behind it worries me. That's not the same thing as believing it's true.

Heh. Andrew is starting to sound like some Democratic Presidential candidates we know.

andrewsullivan.com



To: LindyBill who wrote (29244)2/12/2004 9:09:21 PM
From: Jack Hartmann  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793794
 
it does look like a Clinton hit.

Let's say the hype is true. It would make Edwards probably the more viable candidate. I have to believe Dean cannot beat Edwards at this time.

Hillary could run and she could be announcing earlier than RFK's March 16th, 1968 entrance into the democratic primary race. With Kerry out, the race would essentially be anew.

Movie script writers couldn't come up with a more sensational race. :P