SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Castle -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (2737)2/12/2004 8:47:44 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 7936
 
Peer Review Plan Draws Criticism
Under Bush Proposal, OMB Would Evaluate Science Before New Rules Take Effect

By Rick Weiss
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 15, 2004; Page A19

A number of leading researchers are mobilizing against a Bush administration plan that would require new health and environmental regulations to rely more solidly on science that has been peer-reviewed -- an awkward situation in which scientists find themselves arguing against one of the universally accepted gold standards of good science.

The administration proposal, which is open for comment from federal agencies through Friday and could take effect in the next few months, would block the adoption of new federal regulations unless the science being used to justify them passes muster with a centralized peer review process that would be overseen by the White House Office of Management and Budget...

washingtonpost.com



To: TimF who wrote (2737)2/12/2004 9:19:44 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7936
 
It's hard to imagine a paint soaking up a whole lot of pollution, but then it's also hard to imagine chocolate that's a nutritional supplement and they've got that now, too.