SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (182518)2/12/2004 10:40:06 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1575424
 
re: You call the inspections a job well done, but in reality, they were the best the UN could do in a situation doomed to failure.

Brian, you freaking idiot, of course it was doomed to failure, THERE WERE NO WMD'S. What do you expect, they are going to successful finding something that doesn't exist?


Stop, John. They don't want reality. Fantasy is so much better. <g>

Plus, they need to continually justify why they voted the prince into office in the first place.

ted



To: Road Walker who wrote (182518)2/12/2004 11:33:45 PM
From: brian1501  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575424
 
Brian, you freaking idiot, of course it was doomed to failure, THERE WERE NO WMD'S. What do you expect, they are going to successful finding something that doesn't exist?

I don't know why I'm even responding to this garbage, but what the hell.

John, you freaking idiot, the entire point of the comment is the inspections were doomed to failure regardless of the presence of the WMD, because Iraq was NOT a willing participant in the inspections. Do you really believe for one second that a team of UN inspectors is going to prove conclusively that there is, or is not WMD without complete, unfettered, and EAGER willingness to provide access to the country?

Do you mind explaining, genius, how hindsight of the existence of WMD can possibly figure into a discussion of whether the inspection regime was workable in the first place?? You make no sense.

Brian