Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (29439)	2/13/2004 4:31:40 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793937

THE KERRY “BUBBLE” [Rich Lowry] There’s been a lot of talk over the last week about how John Kerry’s strength is built on a bubble of electability – everyone thinks that everyone else thinks he’s electable, so they are voting for him. There’s obviously something to this, and I agree with Jonah’s point that it may be all downhill for Kerry from here. But I think some of the bubble commentary has been overblown (is there a bubble in bubble commentary?). For a couple of reasons: 1) Kerry had a spectacularly strong finish in Iowa before he was riding a wave of primary victories. He must have been doing something right. 2) Objectively, Kerry probably is the strongest Democratic candidate. Gephardt seemed stronger on paper, but there’s no getting around his disqualifying finish in what should have been his strongest state. You can make a case that John Edwards would be a better candidate, but then again, he has almost no national security experience and doesn’t speak very convincingly on foreign policy issues. Lieberman was too conservative for the Democrats and Howard Dean is obviously a disaster. That leaves Kerry. 3) Lots of people have poked fun at the Democrats for caring so much about electability, but then again, if they had thrown electability out the window and gone for Howard Dean, a lot of us would be writing about how outrageous it is that the Democrats “don’t even care about winning this year.” 4) Yes, the exit polls say that people voting on the issues like candidates other than John Kerry. But I’m not sure how meaningful this is since there aren’t many stark differences on the issues between the candidates. It seems perfectly reasonable to me that someone who likes Howard Dean’s message or what John Edwards says would vote for Kerry based on his electability, since the Massachusetts senator basically says all the same things that Dean and Edwards do.

To: LindyBill who wrote (29439)	2/13/2004 5:04:46 PM
From: Jack Hartmann	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793937

Can we all pretend we didn't hear this and carry on as normal? I think Kerry was clear on Imus. Kerry: There's nothing to report, nothing to report, nothing to talk about... No. I figure Drudge, if wrong, sustains a credibilty gap. Even if right, people would be more skeptical on his next headline ala the LA Times on Arnold.