SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tradelite who wrote (17319)2/14/2004 2:15:49 PM
From: Wyätt GwyönRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
the lender's lien is released from the title when mortgage is paid off. at least in my case it was. as i recall i got a lien release in the mail from the lender, which i then filed with the county. so the public records would be updated with this information. there is always a possibility that some people are remiss about filing this, so county records could show liens that don't exist. but that simply implies a higher percentage of free-and-clear homeownership than is revealed by public records.

which means the home equity percentage of mortgaged households is even lower.

and that lender wouldn't know whether I still own the place or agreed to sell it to my cousin the next day in an installment sale with a privately held mortgage

to make a legal sale, i believe there would have to be a title transfer, and the lender would have a lien on the title.



To: Tradelite who wrote (17319)2/14/2004 9:01:05 PM
From: Michael CashRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
<<I paid mine off, but no one knows this except my lender>>

Didn't Robert Reich propose to tax people who owned their homes free of mortgage on the implied rent value as "income" back during Clinton's admin? He said it was "unfair" to own your own home free and clear. Watch out for those democrats.