SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (2374)2/14/2004 6:33:49 PM
From: American SpiritRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
This is about a second picture. Two of them on stage together. Totally doctored. A complete fabrication.
The photo of them in the stands together means nothing. They were NOT working together, just different types of voices in anti-war movement.



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (2374)2/14/2004 6:35:59 PM
From: American SpiritRespond to of 81568
 
Read what the dirty tricks guys are planning, with Newsmax:

To: Madstrider
Please be specific. I have seen three photographs here. One is Kerry and Fonda sitting in the audience at the Valley Forge Rally for Vietnam Veterans Against the War. This one is apparently legit. The second is one that was created, with usual excellence, by Registered. This one bears his name, and was credited to him on FR.
The third photograph I have seen shows Fonda at the microphone at that same Rally, and Kerry in the nearground holding a sheaf of papers, apparently either about to speak next or having just spoken. No one else appears in that photograph. This one I had speculated should exist in the morgue of a paper in the metro-Philly area, or in the files of the photographers who covered that Rally.

Since Fonda provided heavy financing for the Valley Forge Rally, the previous Detroit "testimony" from "claimed" Vietnam vets, and the movie, F.T.A., and Kerry was head of VVAW, it is hard to believe that they were not together at some point either when the money changed hands, or speeches were being made. So a photo like that should exist.

So, which is the apparent "fake photo" you're referring to? Is it the one that Registered created, and clearly labeled as his creation? Or is it that third photo, showing Fonda and Kerry on the stage together in Valley Forge? For those of us who have been following this subject closely, pkease state which you mean.

Congressman Billybob

Click here, then click the blue CFR button, to join the anti-CFR effort (or visit the "Hugh & Series, Critical & Pulled by JimRob" thread). Don't delay. Do it now.

28 posted on 02/12/2004 3:03:53 PM PST by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Dog
Also be advised that DNC pigs will play the Soviet gambit -planting false-proofs of actual events. Some sucker runs with it, gets discredited, so when the REAL proof turns up they claim "just another fake, like last time".

29 posted on 02/12/2004 3:04:13 PM PST by Fenris6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Madstrider
I don't know if anyone else did, too, but I let NewsMax know of the fake, and it was down within minutes of my email.

30 posted on 02/12/2004 3:04:20 PM PST by Flyer (Don't help elect a Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Madstrider
I saw the Post: Hanoi Jane on Paul Zahn Now!
It had a fake picture. I smelled a rat. I book marked and when I went back it was gone. Fine with me it should have been deleted if it was false. However, what concerns me is the fact that it (Post number 44) was not purged or replaced with "deleted by moderator". Instead it was replaced with another picture (a fine photo of Ted) and numbered 44, as if the first picture was never there. I wrote a reply that the thing smelled like a scene from 1984.
Is it a policy of FR to replace posts already posted with more acceptable ones or was this an aberration? It looked like a cover up and that makes us look worse than the post itself. Delete it, ban it but do not pretend it never existed.

Not aimed at you,Madstrider

31 posted on 02/12/2004 3:05:22 PM PST by TAP ONLINE (Not a hater, just smart enough to know when I saw evil..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Flyer
Is this the NewsMax pic? This is still on their server:

32 posted on 02/12/2004 3:05:27 PM PST by GulliverSwift (Keep the <a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/">gigolo</a> out of the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: leadpenny; Dog
NewsMax grabbed the first one off this very site and claimed it as their own, without crediting FR for having found it in the first place.

* Expect more and more garbage from these A-holes.
Newsmax, Drudge, Hannity and Limbaugh are their outlets to slur Kerry.



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (2374)2/14/2004 7:07:05 PM
From: lorneRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Looks like the kerry's are into lots of interesting things.

Teresa Heinz Kerry: Bag Lady for the Radical Left
By Ben Johnson
FrontPageMagazine.com | February 13, 2004

With Matt Drudge’s recent revelation that John Kerry is as faithful to his second wife as he was to his old Vietnam “brothers,” the senator’s presidential campaign may depend more than ever on the actions of his wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry. While the mainstream media has thus far overlooked the alleged infidelity, media outlets have also overlooked a far more important story: The former Mrs. John Heinz is also in bed – financially – with the radical Left.

Teresa Heinz Kerry has financed the secretive Tides Foundation to the tune of more than $4 million over the years. The Tides Foundation, a “charity” established in 1976 by antiwar leftist activist Drummond Pike, distributes millions of dollars in grants every year to political organizations advocating far-Left causes. The Tides Foundation and its closely allied Tides Center, which was spun off from the Foundation in 1996 but run by Drummond Pike, distributed nearly $66 million in grants in 2002 alone. In all, Tides has distributed more than $300 million for the Left. These funds went to rabid antiwar demonstrators, anti-trade demonstrators, domestic Islamist organizations, pro-terrorists legal groups, environmentalists, abortion partisans, extremist homosexual activists and open borders advocates.

Full article >>>>
frontpagemagazine.com



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (2374)2/14/2004 7:08:25 PM
From: Thomas M.Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Evidently the Aussies & Brits dread the thought of Kerry as U.S. Pres. Why?

The Sun is a Murdoch paper. Don't confuse the opinions of the Australian public with those of the Neocons.

Tom



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (2374)2/14/2004 7:27:34 PM
From: ChinuSFORespond to of 81568
 
Electoral arithmetic that binds Bush to bin Laden

...continued from observer.guardian.co.uk

Americans have not yet understood that Bush is spending their children's money, and haven't yet felt the catastrophic fall in the dollar's value. What they do know is that they are paying less tax and that they can borrow cheaply. To hell with talk of inflation. That's a European thing, ain't it?

All this - liberal outrage, swing voters, gun clubs, the economy even - counts for nothing in the face of the country's Number One Foe - Osama bin Laden.

In a very real sense, he is Bush's greatest electoral asset. If he is captured or killed in the next nine months, Bush is probably a shoo-in. If he remains at large, Bush doesn't really need to present a case other than the one he made on Meet the Press last Sunday, when he said: 'I'm a war President. I make decisions here in the Oval Office in foreign policy matters with war on my mind.'

The rather chilling thing is to consider how bin Laden and his al-Qaeda lieutenants view the election. Would they rather have a President Kerry or Edwards, who would make overtures to Islam, embrace the UN and heed world opinion, or would they prefer four more years of a man who had done so much to isolate America from the rest of the world?

Osama needs George, and to a degree George needs the mystical fear that Osama evokes. And it is this fear that will see this second-rate, isolationist, spendthrift President re-elected to the White House.