Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (2596)	2/16/2004 8:41:58 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Respond to of 81568

I hope someone has the balls to stand up to George Bush and tell him that America has no interest in toppling HUssein the way they did, spending the billions of dollars. Bush told us he had connections with Al Qaeda. That was lie. There is no proof even to this day. In fact the Muslim zealots of Al Qaeda did not consider Hussein a Muslim at all for encouraging drinking parties etc. in his palace. Besides, when he attacked Kuwait, he lost the support and sympathy of the Arab as well as the Muslim world. A Muslim believes that "A Muslim does not attack a Muslim" And when Saddam attacked Muslim Kuwait he was done. So Bush lied about Al Qaeda connection. I will not go anywhere near the WMD. It was a blatant lie. Bush new it all along. He talks about brutality. My foot. There is so much brutality everywhere else in the world. The Presidents before him did not think it was that important to go after Saddam because of the brutality on his own people. President Reagan, his father and Clinton didn't care less about the brutality. And here come our great Dubya who decides to dig up history and take punitive action on Saddam. Is this President screwed up or what.