Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (6991)	2/17/2004 11:17:42 AM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

Again - you miss the point. Even if it can't be proven one way or another, do you want to spend the entire campaign debating who was better with bimbos? Or what someone did 30 years ago?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (6991)	2/18/2004 5:27:46 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

"There is not a shred of evidence that he deserted." That's actually backwards. There is not a shred of evidence that he attended the drills. Ah, I dolove posts by those folks who believe that those accused of the most horrendeous crimes should be given the absolute protection of the belief that they are innocent until proven guilty, but believe that when it comes to the President, he should be considered guilty until he proves himself innocent. The hypocrisy of the modern liberal never ceases to amuse me.