SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: redfish who wrote (30116)2/17/2004 10:56:14 AM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 793698
 
You dont defeat islamic terrorist by creating a depression at home. If 9/11 happened in 1998, we would have some agreement but it didnt and anyone who thinks we werent on the verge of depression after 9/11 is just not a student of economics. Also the bold move in Iraq is a strategic move to take down, not only the taliban al quaeda of today but the threat of a greater al quaeda tomorrow. Or at least that was the plan. Some folks just want to go cave by cave. I agree with the president and hope we see the fruits of this war in short order. Mike



To: redfish who wrote (30116)2/17/2004 2:12:17 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793698
 
But that sort of war would likely have entailed an invasion of Pakistan instead of the distraction of Iraq.

Oh, that would have been a move the Author would have been behind. In a pigs eye! We go into countries with Nukes only when forced to. Bush is "damned if you do or don't" by people like this.

Liberals are wonderful at the "you must sacrifice, I will lead you!" rhetoric.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News