SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Libertarian Discussion Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LPS5 who wrote (5600)2/17/2004 8:39:51 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 13056
 
A collection of his at least questionably legal acts would be most interesting.

Another clause I have never been able to find in the Constitution is the one that says a state cannot secede. Apparently they have a different copy of the document.



To: LPS5 who wrote (5600)2/18/2004 10:59:56 AM
From: Dan B.  Respond to of 13056
 
Yes, well, it would seem he did good. He and Jefferson agreed the branches of government are equal, and he by god defended his interpretation of the Constitution by freeing slaves in defiance of the Supreme Court, and his notion in this stuck, not that of the Court and its Dred Scott decision. Interesting links on the matter in my original post.

Dan B.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News