Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (182876)	2/17/2004 3:26:49 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578531

And why was a soon to be VP of the US pushing such tactics? Sounds slimy to me! Only because you are too biased or too dense to figure out the real reason. And that is? Al

To: hmaly who wrote (182876)	2/17/2004 10:28:35 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578531

Ted Re...If they were all so legal, why did Halliburton go through its foreign subsidies to avoid the sanctions? Having a hard time figuring it out, are you? Try this, Saddam did the ordering, and Saddam purchased the goods through Dressler, Halburtons subsidiary. So that's how you ease your conscience........you tell it little white lies. And why was a soon to be VP of the US pushing such tactics? Sounds slimy to me! Only because you are too biased or too dense to figure out the real reason. LOL! Where there's smoke, there's usually fire. And as for your German claims.......let's make clear, those sales took place in the '80s. To date you have not shown us proof that they happened in the '90s Wrong. I posted several links. Here is one again. atimes.com; Read the article again......its a mass of contradiction. And we could argue for days each point but bottom line the BND was wrong. And how do we know the BND was wrong? Guess!