SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (30150)2/17/2004 4:07:38 PM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 793897
 
Yes, the other side of hillary's gain was a tax loss for some wealthy arkansan who was able to get hillary 100k at a cost of 30k. Of course hillary would have to have paid taxes on the gain in some fashion or in some way move that money to the campaign. But those records are long gone. Also with some brokers some transactions were not necessary to report to IRS and it became the taxpayers responsibility. I wonder how she treated the income or expensed it? mike


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News