Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (182933)	2/18/2004 10:50:16 AM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578704

To all. You might want a heads up. MTXX just hit a double bottom, about 7 days apart. The stock dropped in half on a rumour, the companies denies. If the rumour is false, the stock should easily go bact to the mid teens. I just don't see a company denying the rumors as vigorously as they did, in this age of lawsuits, if the rumor were true.

To: hmaly who wrote (182933)	2/18/2004 3:34:58 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578704

Ted Re....So that's how you ease your conscience........you tell it little white lies. What white lies. Be specific. Better yet, read my answer to John, and his reply, and tell me where I lied about anything. John seems to agree with me. I told you.....during the 90s, Saddam was in no position to barter. It was HAL that called the shots. And we could argue for days each point but bottom line the BND was wrong. Really. And you know that because, you know the companies, who reported the materials as shipped were lying? Or are you accusing the BND of being in cahoots with GW, against Schroeder? Please tell me. How can you be so positive those materials weren't shipped? Because there are no WMD!