To: PROLIFE who wrote (541934 ) 2/18/2004 1:32:40 PM From: Orcastraiter Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667 1. Israel/Palestine ..paying the families of the homicide bombers Most of the Arab world was supporting Palestine, including Saudis, Jordanians, Egyptians and others. Supporting Palestine is a very popular concept in the Arab world.2. killing no telling how many of his own Yes he was a brutal dictator, one that we supported. He was able to kill many of his own people and those that opposed him because we supported him. We needed to change our ways with Saddam, no doubt. But this was not a reason in and of itself to go to war. Charles Taylor is slaughtering his own in Liberia. And in Rowanda civil war and slaughter went on almost with out notice. Why are we not sending troops to these attrocities? Haiti is erupting with violence. Shall we send troops to our back door?3. countries illegally making back door deals for his oil, affecting the rest of the world market. BS. The trickle of oil leaving Iraq during the sanctions was not affecting the world oil market. You are clearly uninformed, or delusional, or both.4. he attacked...Kurds...Iran... Kuwait..all of whom still had missing family members. We, and the rest of the world, including the UN, went to war for these transgressions. As a result of the war, the sanctions, the no fly zones, the strategic bombing, Iraq and Saddam was crippled from affecting the world in any significant way. His only affect on the world was a small one, which you mentioned in number 1 above. But remember his support of Palestine was only a small part of the money that flows in support of Palestine from all over the Arab world.5. Libya. What connection is there between Iraq and Libya? The connection was between Pakistan and Libya, and Pakistan is our ally?6. Terrorists witha MUCH freer reign to run in and out of countries then. That's BS. Terrorists have been gravitating to Iraq since the war began. They can move in and out of Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan as freely today as they ever have. The borders of these countries are not secured in any meaningful manner today. There was no need to go to war with Iraq in the fashion that Bush did. Sorry all of your reasons are hollow. The real reason to go to war in Iraq was to secure the oil. This operation was pre planned before 9-11. The PNAC was writing about the need for this "intervention" decades ago. Even wrote about the need for some "galvanizing" event to justify the attack. I'd say you have been dipped in zinc. Orca