Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (30368)	2/18/2004 8:47:56 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793698

I don't hate Bush, and frankly I thought that post was on a different thread. If I'd noticed it was here, I wouldn't have posted it, since the humor appreciated here is of a different political persuasion, and I'm sensitive to that, even though I don't get your humor any more than you get mine. It would probably be more logical, though, not to go around labeling a statement such as mine as evidence of Bush hatred. I've seen hatred, and frankly what I said doesn't look a thing like real hatred. I don't want to put Bush in a camp, or label him a terrorist, or traitor, or hurt him in any way. Real hate looks quite a bit different, imo, and it is a bad idea to minimize what real hate is, by taking a post like mine, and trying to use it to further an agenda, by citing it as some sort of example of "hate". It just doesn't make for a good world. I don't even call Bush made up "funny" names. I don't need to do that, and I think it dehumanizes people when you call them names. Something you might want to think about, in terms of "hate".