To: SecularBull who wrote (542338 ) 2/19/2004 12:32:21 AM From: Johannes Pilch Read Replies (1) | Respond to You have to draw a line somewhere, and perhaps the normal ability to procreate is the the line?? anti you. Your wife also understands that suicide is contrary to her existence and as such she knows it forms no basis for her participation in your family. You both together understand that suicide is no basis for the creation of society with one another. You create a society of two with the assumption that suicide is not your identity, but serves as no basis for the establishment and support of your identity in nature. It is, by nature, not you.not science, they cause that organization to declare the wish for suicide not a sickness, but part of you. They begin to infiltrate your schools to teach the normalcy of suicide, influencing young minds to their views. They show how suicide exists even in animals and on that basis argue that it should be acceptable to you. They begin to fill your courts with judges who pass laws allowing them to adopt children. These judges also decree that suicide is indeed you and that as long as no one forces you to commit suicide yourself, you must accept suicide as a normal part of your society. If you rent homes knowing that the renters will be allowing many suicides to take place in them, you have no right to deny the renters on the basis of their support for suicide. Since suicide has been deemed you, then should medical difficulties arise as a result of failed suicide attempts, your society must pay for these difficulties. If you hire people, you cannot deny employment to anyone who teaches that suicide is you. Indeed, where two people form a relationship based upon the practice of helping suicides take place, you must grant health benefits to both, despite that people who take the “suicide is us” view tend toward some of the most expensive and debilitating medical difficulties in your society.
